A page for my over-the-board games
from team competitions of 2012
game 6
jump to the analysis of game 6 |
Delhey, Matthias (-) | - | Hoffmann, Ernst (1328) | 04.06.2012 | 1-0
jump to the replayer of game 6 |
game 5
jump to the analysis of game 5 |
Delhey, Matthias (-) | - | Jaeger, Thorsten (1772) | 21.05.2012 | 0-1
jump to the replayer of game 5 |
game 4
jump to the analysis of game 4 |
Einacker, Silke (1905) | - | Delhey, Matthias (-) | 11.05.2012 | 1/2-1/2
jump to the replayer of game 4 |
game 3
jump to the analysis of game 3 |
Kraft, Volker (1117) | - | Delhey, Matthias (-) | 17.04.2012 | 0-1
jump to the replayer of game 3 |
game 2
jump to the analysis of game 2 |
Delhey, Matthias (-) | - | Wolfhagen, Helmuth (1453) | 26.03.2012 |
1/2-1/2
jump to the replayer of game 2 |
game 1
jump to the analysis of game 1 |
Goldbaum, Karl-Uwe (1588) | - | Delhey, Matthias (-) | 19.03.2012 | 1/2-1/2
jump to the replayer of game 1 |
game 6
Delhey, Matthias (-) - Hoffmann, Ernst (1328), Grosshansdorf 04.06.2012
Kreisliga D Mannschaftskampf, SVG 3 - Sasel 2, round 9, board 8
[Opening: Reti Opening, Lessing Defence (A04)]
replay game 6:
game 5
Delhey, Matthias (-) - Jaeger, Thorsten, Grosshansdorf 21.05.2012
Stadtliga B Mannschaftskampf, SVG 2 - SF 2, round 8, board 8
[Opening: Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch defence (D32)]
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. e3 ... rather weak, but ok; a good continuation is maybe cxd4 which may lead to the Schlechter-Rubinstein system: [4. cxd5 exd5 5.Nf3 Nc6 6. g3 ...] 4. ... Nf6 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. b3? ... a bad move, that causes trouble - playable is a3 or cxd5 6. ... cxd4 7. exd4 Bb4 8. Bd2? ... a mistake, looses the d-pawn after dxc4; Bb2 was the right move 8. ... dxc4 9. Bxc4 Nxd4 10. 0-0?? ... the Queen can't retake on f3 after Nxf3, as she has to defend the bishop, I completly missed that; a3 was the right choice or at least Nxd4 10. ... Nxf3 11. gxf3 0-0 12. Qc2? ... a bad place for the queen, she should move to e2 12. ... Bd7! theatens Rc8 + b5 13. Bg5 h6 14. Bh4 Rc8 15. Rad1 g5 16. Bg3 Bxc3 17. Qxc3 b5 it's hard to know what to do now 18. Be5 ... good move here, but it was maybe even stronger after displacing the rook with Bd6 18. ... Nd5 19. Qd4 f6 [19. ... bxc4 20. bxc4 Nb6 21. c5 Nd5] 20. Bxd5 fxe5 21. Bxe6? ... here Qe4 - threatening perpetual check on g6 and h6 - could have saved white's light-square bishop, as a club colleague pointed out after the match [21. Qe4 Qe8 22. Bb7 Rb8] 21. ... Bxe6 now it's pretty much game over 22. Qxe5 Qf6 23. Rfe1 Qxe5 24. Rxe5 Bh3 25. Rxb5 Rxf3 26. Rb7 Rf7 27. Rb4 Rc2 28. Rb8 Kg7 white resigns 1-0
replay game 5:
game 4
Einacker, Silke (1905) - Delhey, Matthias (-), Hamburg Eidelstedt 11.05.2012
Stadtliga B Mannschaftskampf, HSK 7 - SVG 2, round 7, board 8
[Opening: Sicilian, Scheveningen variation (B80)]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e6 now the Scheveningen variation is set up which anables black to castle early 6. Be2 Be7 7. 0-0 0-0 8. Kh1 ... the move prepares f4 without check problems later in the middle game 8. ... a6 9. a4 ... prevents the planed b5 for black and therefore hinders the development of the bishop to b7 9. ... Qc7 10. f4 Bd7 b6 followed by Bb7 was the better option, maybe 11. Be3 Nc6 12. Nb3 Rac8 13. Bf3 ... black has a serious space problem allready and nearly no moves! 13. ... Nb4 14. a5 ... threatening Bb6 14. ... d5 I choose to open up my position, allthough this might become a pawn sacrifice 15. e5 Ne4 16. Bxe4 dxe4 17. Bb6 Qc6 18. Nd4 Qc4 19. Re1 Nd5 20. Nxd5 exd5 now the passed pawn on e4 is save, but whites f and e pawns are mighty 21. f5 Bg5 22. c3 Rfe8 23. Qg4 Bd2 Bh6 was more save but also more boring 24. Re2 e3 25. Qg3 Qd3 26. f6 Qg6 27. Qxg6 hxg6 b 1:12h / w 0:1928. fxg7 Bg4 no need to take the pawn right now, I thought, but it was: take now or get a problem later! 29. Nf3 Bxf3 30. gxf3 Rxe5 31. Ra4 Rc4 32. Rxc4 dxc4 33. Bd4 Rxa5 more solid was Re6 maybe, preparing f6 and Kxg7 34. Kg2 ... white offers draw 34. ... Ra2 35. Kh3 Rxb2 36. Rg2 ... the crucial moment of the game! white theatens Rg4-h4-h8 mating or queening, but there is a simple way to stop the desaster and clearly win the game, which I missed: that is Rb3! Instead I sacrificed my bishop and had to struggle for draw 6. ... Bxc3 37. Bxc3 Rxg2 38. Kxg2 f5 39. f4 b6 40. Kf3 a5 41. Kxe3 b5 offering the a-pawn to get the king free 42. Bxa5 Kxg7 43. Bd8 Kf7 44. Kd4 Ke6 black offers draw 45. Kc3 Kd5 46. Bg5 Ke4 47. Bh6 Kd5 48. h4 Ke4 49. Kb4 Kd3 50. Bg7 Ke4 51. Be5 Kd3 52. Bc3 Kc2 53. Be1 Kd3 54. Bc3 Kc2 55. Be5 Kd3 white found no way to win this and maybe there is no way if black plays precisely, so: draw agreed 1/2-1/2
replay game 4 (click on square E7 to switch to my perspective):
game 3
Kraft, Volker (1117) - Delhey, Matthias (-), Geesthacht 17.04.2012
Kreisliga D Mannschaftskampf, Bille SC 4 - Grosshansdorf 3, round 6, board 8
[Opening: Sicilian Defence/French Variation (B40)]
my opponent was not that strong this time, so I had a very good game...
1. | e4 | Nf3 | |
2. | Nf4 | e6 | |
3. | d3 | ... | an uncommon move, the normal line in the sicilian is [3. d4 cd 4. Nxd4] |
3. | ... | g6 | unusual as well and not quite correct, I think, but the fianchettoed Bishop, that this move prepares, became a powerfull weapon later in the game |
4. | Be3 | ... | threatens to grab a pawn on c5 when I do the Fianchetto |
4. | ... | d6 | |
5. | d4 | ... | still no piece developed and the center battle allready begins |
5. | ... | Qc7 | |
6. | Nc3 | a6 | |
7. | b3 | Bg7 | finally I got the time to move the Bishop out |
8. | e5 | cxd4 | |
9. | Bxd4 | ... | a mistake, the right way to take back was Qxd4 |
9. | ... | dxe5 |
now there's no way to avoid a loss: Bishop or Knight takes on d5 looses a piece and Bishop moves looses the Knight on c3
10. | Ne2 | exd4 | |
11. | Qd3 | Qa5+ | |
12. | Nd2 | Nc6 | |
13. | a3 | Nge7 | still developing |
14. | b4 | Nxb4 | possible because the Rook hangs |
15. | Qb3 | d3! |
16. | Rc1 | Nxc2+ | |
17. | Kd1 | dxe2+ | |
18. | Bxe2 | Nd4 | |
19. | Qb4 | Nec6 | |
20. | Rc5 | Qd8 | |
21. | Bf3 | ... | oops, never mind a hanging queen, the game's lost anyway |
21. | ... | Nxb4 | 0-1 |
replay game 3 (click on square E7 to switch to my perspective):
game 2
Delhey, Matthias (-) - Wolfhagen, Helmuth (1453), Grosshansdorf 26.03.2012
Kreisliga D Mannschaftskampf, Grosshansdorf 3 - Bergedorf, round 5, board 8
[Opening: Indian Game/Knights Variation (A46) tranferred to
Slav Defence/Three Knights Variantion (D15)]
1. | d4 | Nf6 | |
2. | Nf3 | d5 | |
3. | c4 | c6 | |
4. | Nc3 | Bg4 |
the best continuation here is [5. Ne5 Bh5 6. f3], I think
6. | e3 | Bd6 | |
7. | Bxd6 | Qxd6 | this line leads to draw in most games, probably |
8. | c5 | ... | not so good, causes a static center, but I wanted to gain a tempo back, cd or Be2 was better |
8. | ... | Qe7 | |
9. | Be2 | Bxf3 | |
10. | Bxf3 | Nbd7 | |
11. | 0-0 | 0-0 | |
12. | b4 | ... | e4 was better |
12. | ... | e5 | |
13. | Re1 | e4 | |
14. | Be2 | h6 | |
15. | b5 | Nh7 | |
16. | bxc6 | ... | better f3 |
16. | ... | bxc6 | |
17. | Qa4 | Rfc8 | |
18. | Bg4 | Rc7 | forced, because of Nxd5 cxd5 Qxd6 winning a pawn |
19. | Rab1 | Nhf6 | |
20. | Bh3 | ... | I was aware of g5 g6 capturing the Bishop, but wanted to keep the presure on d7, pointlessly |
20. | ... | g5 | |
21. | Bf5 | Nf8 |
23. Reb1 Rd8
24. Bxe6 Qxe6
25. ... Rdd7
26. ... Qe7
27. Rb8+ Kg7
28. Ne2 h5
29. Ng3 Kg6
30. Rh8? Rd8
31. Rxd8 Qxd8
32. ... Qd7
33. Rxc7 Qxc7
34. Ne2 Ng8
36. Nb3 Ke7
37. Na5 Kd7
38. Nb7 Qb8
39. ... f5
40. Nd6 Ne7
41. Nf7 g4
43. Ne5 Qc7
44. h3 Kf6
45. hg hg
46. Qf1 Ng6 1/2-1/2
replay game 2:
game 1 - my first team match
Goldbaum, Karl-Uwe (1588) - Delhey, Matthias (-), Hamburg Farmsen 19.03.2012
Stadtliga B Mannschaftskampf, Farmsen 1 - Grosshansdorf 2, round 5, board 8
[Opening: Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack (A06)]
1. Nf3 d5
2. b3 Nc6
3. Bb2
looks allready scary and I had no clue, what this opening is called or all about -
now I learned it's the Nimzo-Larsen-Attack, only my defence is not in the books
and has no name
3. ... f6
I decided to block that bishop eying my king side right away
4. e3 e5
5. ... Be6
6. Nf3 Qd7
ready to castle longside, didn't know that white would develop his queenside so rapidly! see next diagram
7. c4 Bb4
8. a3 Be7
9. cxd5 Bxd5
10. Nc3 Be6
11. Qc2
11. ... Nh6
12. b4 a6
13. Na4 Bf5
14. e4 Be6
15. Nc5 Bxc5
16. Qxc5 Nf7
17. Be2 Qd6
18. Rc1 0-0
white's queenside attack is in full swing and my pawn on c7 is awfully weak
19. b5 Qxc5
20. Rxc5 axb5
21. Bxb5 Bd7
22. Rc1 Nd6
23. Bd3 Ra5
finally I solved my problems more or less and mobilised my troups
24. 0-0 Bg4
25. Ne1 Rd8
26. f3 Be6
27. Kf2 Nb5
28. Bxb5 Rxb5
29. Bc3
probably the strongest position of the game for me, but I couldn't gain any advantage, maybe I should have moved Bc4 here
29. ... Ra8
30. Ra1 Rb3
31. Nc2 Bc4
32. Rfc1 Bd3
33. Nb4 Nxb4
34. axb4 Rba3
35. Rxa3 Rxa3
36. Ke3 Bb5
37. Ra1 Rb3
38. Kf2 1/2-1/2
I agreed to my opponents second draw offering, because I saw no way to win this,
but the result is ok for me!
replay game 1 (click on square E7 to switch to my perspective):
25.03.2012 / update 27.01.2013